The most revolutionary discovery of quantum mechanics is the paradox of quantum nonlocality. This draws attention to the phenomenon known as quantum entanglement.
 
As a result, quantum mechanics violates the principle of locality. This principle states that changes in one physical system should have no immediate effect on another separated system.
 
Our “local” view of the world assumes phenomena are separated by time and space. Thus, no influence can travel faster than the speed of light.
 
Quantum nonlocality proves these assumptions are mistaken.
 
A principle of holistic interconnectedness exists operating at the quantum level. And this contradicts the local assumptions of classical physics.
 
At the quantum level, instantaneous actions can occur.
 
Science does not appear ready to equate nonlocality with the spiritual realm. However, the nonlocal reality that we live in tends to mimic the properties often associated with the spiritual.
 
Carl Jung developed an acausal understanding of synchronicity. His concept of synchronicity was inspired by quantum theory and through his association with the great physicist Wolfgang Pauli,
 
Science is an approach to knowledge based on causality. Causal explanations emphasize one thing affecting another through an exchange of energy, forces, or information.
 
In contrast, synchronicity involves acausal explanations with no identifiable governing forces or physical energy exchange.
 
With synchronicity, there appear no causal connections between inner and outer events. Instead, they are symbolic expressions of transformative meaning. Thus, they challenge fundamental axioms of science.

There has been much discussion of the stages of mystical experience. 

Indeed, William James, a pioneer in the study of mystical experience, first characterized the process as one of “organic ripening.” 

There are some minor differences in the stages proposed by various scholars. But all the phase-models share similarities to the experience of a psychological crisis. 

For example, all the models proposed by scholars describe 

• unexpected stressful life events
• a temporary reduction in functioning
• the possibility of personal and spiritual growth

In my book Mystical Experience: A Psychological Perspective, I described a five-phase crisis model. This model was based on the five major phases of a crisis experience: 1) pre-crisis, 2) impact, 3) crisis, 4) resolution, and 5) post-crisis.  

Here I will provide an overview of these five phases.  

Of course, there are limits of any phase-model to capture the essence of mystical experience. Some phases can succeed each other more quickly, some phases can appear to be bypassed, or the process can become locked into a particular phase. 

However, the usefulness of a crisis model is that it produces testable predictions for empirical research. 

Phase 1: Pre-Crisis Phase

During the pre-crisis stage, the person maintains an equilibrium. 

The stress they encounter is balanced by their coping mechanisms. 

To maintain equilibrium people are always solving problems. As long as people believe their problems can be solved using their available coping skills, equilibrium is maintained.

​Phase 2: Impact Phase

A psychological crisis begins with a sudden disruption to important life goals. These disruptions cannot be overcome with usual problem-solving methods.  

Examples of stressful events precipitating a crisis include:

• troubled personal relationships
• loss of jobs
• financial problems
• life transitions
• deaths
• terminal illnesses

The first 1-3 days of a crisis are spent in shock, feeling confused, weak, and helpless, while everything seems to be in chaos. 

Not all stressed persons move into a crisis state. 

The external events themselves do not define the crisis, but instead, the person’s responses and reactions to the event do. 

Phase 3: Crisis Phase

The initial impact period brings a 1-3 month crisis period. This is characterized by anxiety, hypersensitivity, irritable mood, tiredness, depression, and sleeping disorders.  

In the crisis phase the person confronts the problem. The person’s usual strategies have failed to solve the problem brought about by the precipitating event. 

From this point, the person is in a downward spiral becoming increasingly disorganized, anxious, tense, and hopeless. 

Sooner or later the person confronts deep-rooted existential concerns about the meaning of life. 

This is the sense one must, and yet one cannot find any real “truth.” This leads to non-rational guidance. 

Phase 4: Resolution Phase

The resolution phase includes all the new attempts directed toward easing tension. The decision-making processes, however, are based on intuitive gut reactions, instead of analytical thinking. 

Resolutions have the potential to be adaptive or maladaptive. 

William James acknowledged mystical experiences were not always positive. He described some that were downright, harmful, evil, and frightening. 

A comprehensive model of mystical experience needs to consider the potential for both positive and negative outcomes. 

Phase 5: Post-Crisis Phase

The post-crisis phase is the 2-12 month period after which the above phases have passed. 

This last phase is a period of restoration, rebuilding, and readjustment. It is a period of significant, sometimes radical, transformation in the person. 

Some equilibrium is restored during the post-crisis phase. Yet this equilibrium can be lower, the same, or higher than the one previous to the crisis. 

Figure 4 illustrates four potential consequences after encountering an adverse event.  

• Succumbing: The first possibility is the initial adverse event damaging one’s ability to function and cope. In this case, the person succumbs, defeated. 
• Survival with impairment: A second possibility is the person survives but is diminished or impaired. 
• Resilience: A third potential outcome is the person returns to the pre-adversity level of functioning. 
• Thriving: The fourth possibility is the person may surpass the previous level of functioning, and he or she thrives. The thriving outcome is traumatic growth. 

Mystical experiences often cause positive, lasting effects. The positive change has been classified into four areas toward self, others, life, and the mystical experience itself. 

First, the mystical experience induces a powerful transformation in one’s personality. The personality changes are not so much at the level of core personality traits. Instead, goals, feelings, attitudes, behaviors, and life meaning are radically transformed. 

The second change following mystical states is the person acts more open, authentic, and tolerant of others. 

The third change is about attitudes toward life. Mystical experience often facilities the emergence of hope. Purpose and meaning become more prominent in everyday life. 

The last change involves attitudes toward the mystical experience. There is a new, more profound understanding of the role mystical experiences play in the unfolding of life.

So, the next time you have a stressful life event occur, and seem to despair about life’s meaning, it could be the first step to transformation. Which could lead you to a greater experience of meaning than you could ever imagine.

One may say truly, I think, that personal religious experience has its root and center in mystical states of consciousness. 
—William James (1902, p. 379)

​Have you ever had a mystical experience?

What separates a mystical experience from an ordinary one? 

Researchers agree the one essential feature of mystical experience is an experience of unity. 

Indeed, debates on mystical experience are best understood in terms of how this unity is to be interpreted. 

Much of the Western study on mystical experience begins with reference to William James’s book Varieties of Religious Experience. 

James tells us that mystical experience is a relatively rare event in which individual consciousness merges in radical unity with the universe.

James identified four characteristics of all mystical experiences: 

• Ineffability
• Noetic quality
• Transiency,
• Passivity.

What is essential from James’s investigation is the notion that mystical experience is different from the everyday world of experience. 

James set the standard for the modern study of mystical experience. 

​One of the questions researchers have asked since James work is: What is the mystical experience of unity all about exactly?  

Stace (1960) contended that the mystical experience of unity is expressed in one of two ways: “introvertive” and “extrovertive.” 
​
In the introvertive type of unity the subject “looks inward into the mind” to achieve “pure consciousness.” This type of unity is experienced during meditation with one’s eyes closed and is perceived as an experience of nothingness.

In the extrovertive type of unity the subject “looks outward through the senses” (Stace, 1960, p. 110) and grasps the unity of all things in or through the multiplicity of the natural world. In this type of experience all things are felt to be alive (e.g., stones, trees, the sky).

Synchronicity, a term coined by the late psychologist Carl Jung, is said to occur when an objective event meaningfully relates to one’s inner state. 

​In a person’s synchronistic encounter, there is no causal connection between the objective event and one’s inner state of being. In other words, this phenomenon can capture the extrovertive sense of mystical experience.